USPTO serial 79019927
FLASHTAB TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3280081Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2007
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLASHTAB TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W. BROOKE
CABINET PLASSERAUD65/67, RUE DE LA VICTOIREF PARIS CEDEX, 75440 09DEXFRANCEGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations which allows the delivery or administration of one or more substances, coated or not, to mask their taste, without having to take water at the same time for the treatment of pain, inflammatory diseases, nausea, allergy, gastric ailments and any other diseases which call for quick-relief treatment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development in the field of pharmacology, especially relating to rapid disintegration multiparticulate pills to be taken orally, which allow the delivery or administration of one or more substances, coated or not, to mask their taste, without having to take water at the same time | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |