Drawing for RIO TINTO DIAMONDS SELECT DIAMANTAIRE

USPTO serial 79019951

RIO TINTO DIAMONDS SELECT DIAMANTAIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3288299Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2007
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIO TINTO DIAMONDS SELECT DIAMANTAIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman and Harvey B. Jacobson, Simor L. Moskowitz, Allen S. Melser, Michael R. Slobasky, Marsha G. Gentner, Jonathan L. Scherer, George W. Lewis, William E. Player, and Nathaniel A. Humphries

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious and semi-precious stones, diamonds, gemstones, jewellery and imitation jewellerySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 6, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 11, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 11, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 10, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 11, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance