Drawing for COLOR BY PHYTOSPECIFIC

USPTO serial 79019965

COLOR BY PHYTOSPECIFIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233616Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR BY PHYTOSPECIFIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert F. Zielinski, Esq.

Robert F. Zielinski, Esq. Law Offices of Robert F. ZielinskiOne South Broad StreetSuite 1500Philadelphia, PA 19107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps for personal use, namely skin soaps; perfumery; perfume; toilet water; essential oils; cosmetics; hair products, namely, non-medicated scalp treatment creams; hair care and beauty preparations; lotions, shampoos, creams, gels, mousses and balms for hair care and styling; hair spray; hair tints; hair colorants; hair bleaching creams and lotionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 15, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 8, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 29, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 29, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 12, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 27, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 18, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Feb 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance