USPTO serial 79020020
ROLLALIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340109Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLLALIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID SAFRAN
DAVID SAFRAN ROBERTS MLOTKOWSKI & HOBBES, P.C.PO BOX 10064MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, measuring computers; instruments or apparatus for aligning spindles, rollers, cylinders or machines, namely visual laser detectors for detecting light and light detectors, image sensors and laser beam detectors, laser beam emitting devices and reflectors; operating systems software and measurement calculating software for the aforesaid computers and measuring computers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Prüftechnik Dieter Busch AG
- Other trademarks owned by Prüftechnik Dieter Busch AG
- Other trademarks owned by Prüftechnik Dieter Busch AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ROLLALIGN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |