Drawing for FUTURE ENERGY ENGINEERING THE FUTURE

USPTO serial 79020030

FUTURE ENERGY ENGINEERING THE FUTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3159199Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUTURE ENERGY ENGINEERING THE FUTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Construction of power generation plants, namely, plants designed to produce electric and thermal energy through gasification of municipal and industrial residual material and waste, lignites having a high content of ballast, oils, slurries, organic chlorine compounds and biomass; maintenance and repair of plants, namely, plants are designed to produce electric and thermal energy through gasification for generating gas and slag from various charges and raw materials, municipal and industrial residual material and waste and biomasses; construction of plants for producing electric and thermal energy through gasification and for producing gas from slag of various charges and raw materials, municipal and industrial residual materials and waste and biomassesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Operation of plants, in particular that are designed to produce electric and thermal energy through gasification for generating gas and slag from various charges and raw materials, municipal and industrial residual material and waste and biomassesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Engineering; design and inspection of plants for producing gas from slag of various charges and raw materials, municipal and industrial residual materials and waste and biomasses as well as scientific and engineering research for such plants; scientific analysis of various materials used for gasification, scientific analysis of end products of gasification, namely, gasification of entrained flow gasification and fixed bed gasification resulting in a synthesis gas having a high content of H2 and CO and little harmful substances; scientific research and development of gasification reactors, their components and the apparatus connected thereto as well as of gasification methodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 13, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 13, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 27, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 26, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 1, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance