USPTO serial 79020066
GIGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cases for child spectacles, cases for spectacles; optical spectacles; optical lenses; sunglasses, sunglass lenses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |