Drawing for KARTOPU

USPTO serial 79020147

KARTOPU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KARTOPU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
023Yarns and threads for textile use, woolSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 23, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2021INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 16, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 27, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 20, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance