Drawing for PAYVA

USPTO serial 79020158

PAYVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318444Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAYVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

JESUS RODRIGUEZ PEREZ E-28036 MADRID9, J HURTADO DE MENDOZA,SPAIN

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Bottled wineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 12, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 13, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 19, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 30, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 21, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 21, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 3, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance