Drawing for NOVOTEL ACCOR HOTELS

USPTO serial 79020217

NOVOTEL ACCOR HOTELS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3286528Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 28, 2007
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOVOTEL ACCOR HOTELS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

Cory M. Amron Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLaw@VorysColumbus, OH 43216-2255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043hotel and restaurant services; temporary accommodations; services provided by hotels, restaurants, cafeterias, tearooms and bars, excluding clubs; reservation of hotel rooms for travelersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 5, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 4, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 26, 2013CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 23, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 23, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance