USPTO serial 79020238
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SE
NL-4878 AH ETTEN-LEUR, NL
NL-4878 AH ETTEN-LEUR, NL
NL-4878 AH ETTEN-LEUR, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metal building materials, namely, wall and ceiling boards, wall and ceiling panels, wall and ceiling tiles, soffits and fascia; non-metal fire-resistant boards and panels for construction; non-metal water resistant boards and panels for construction; non-metal door panels; non-metal suspended ceiling systems comprising panels; non-metal ceiling panels; fireproof tiles; non-metal tiles; non-metal cladding for construction and building; sheathing boards; construction material, namely, fiberglass faced sheathing; wall systems, namely, movable, reusable, wall panels made primarily of non-metal materials; Japanese style indoor sliding partitions not of metal; non-metal curtain walls [ ; non-metal lattices, runners, hangers, profiles, namely, building wall and ceiling framing primarily of non-metal, trims for building purposes, splices, namely, non-metal connectors for walls, ceilings and grid systems, clips for suspended ceilings and walls; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, not included in other classes, namely, non-metal expansion joints for walls and ceiling, construction elements not made of metal, namely, shores, supports and braces; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods in this class, namely, non-metal joinery fittings; non-metallic rigid pipes for building; non-metallic transportable buildings ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |