USPTO serial 79020251
PINK TONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINK TONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 16, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |