Drawing for M.O.L.-ROMGUM

USPTO serial 79020256

M.O.L.-ROMGUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M.O.L.-ROMGUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Rubber products, namely washers for water taps used for water supply, sewerage systems, gas supply and ventilation systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
017Rubber products (including seals, profiles and hoses) for construction, agriculture, the automotive industry, engineering, industry and household appliances; raw rubber and semi-processed rubberSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 28, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance