USPTO serial 79020327
BIMBIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIMBIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bouillon; preparations for making bouillon; bouillon concentrates; coconut butter; peanut butter; broth concentrates; potato crisps; edible oils; powdered eggs; fruit chips; preserved garden herbs; meat extracts; milk beverages (milk predominating); milk products; olive oil for food; palm kernel oil for food; palm oil for food; potato chips; potato fritters; preparations for making soup; vegetable soup preparations; soups; sunflower oil for food; dried vegetables | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Biscuits; cake paste; cake powder; cakes; edible decorations for cakes; flavorings (flavourings), other than essential oils, for cakes; rice cakes; capers; cereal preparations; chips (cereal products); chow-chow (condiments); condiments; corn meal; crackers; farinaceous food pastes; farinaceous foods; maize flakes; oat flakes; flour for food; essences for foodstuffs (except etheric essences and essential oils); ketchup (sauce); macaroni; macaroons (pastry); malt biscuits; meal; farinaceous food pastes; petit-beurre biscuits; potato flour for food; relish (condiments); ribbon vermicelli; rice; saffron (seasonings); seasonings; spaghetti; spices; soya sauce; tomato sauce; sauce (condiments); vermicelli (noodles); waffles; wheat flour | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by "Technokom" Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by TOVARISTVO Z OBMEJENOYU VIDPOVIDALNISTU "TECHNOKOM"
- Other trademarks owned by Mivina Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BIMBIM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |