USPTO serial 79020332
MAXIM SOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIM SOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothes made of every kind of material except clothing for protective purposes (underclothing and outer clothing); clothes produced from combed cotton, tricot, jeans, leather, paper, sports clothes, bathroom and beach clothes, underclothes, gloves; socks, footwear: shoes, top boots, boots, slippers, bootees and their pieces, sport shoes and their studs, shoe pieces, namely soles, heels, boot legs, shoe-uppers; headgear, hats, berets, caps; special goods included in this class for babies: diapers from textile for babies, swaddling clothes from textile for babies, undershirts for babies, nylon underpants, feeding bibs, (excluding paper feeding pips); neckties, bow-ties, foulards, shawls, head scarves, pareos, bandanas, muffs, arm bands, head bands, wristbands; belts, trousers braces, garters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |