Drawing for MATRIX

USPTO serial 79020360

MATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3225295Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 3, 2007
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S EGBERT Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1314 Texas Ave., 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010[ Lamps for medical purposes, namely, heat lamps for medical use, medical examination lamps, quartz lamps for medical purposes, surgical lamps, ultraviolet lamps for medical purposes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Apparatus for artificial tanning and sun-tanning, namely, sun lamps and tanning lamps, mercury steam lamps, high pressure lamps, high intensity discharge lamps; lamps for beauty purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 30, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 6, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 18, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 10, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 10, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 3, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 7, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Jul 27, 2013INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 8, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 9, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 9, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Aug 9, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 27, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jun 27, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2011INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 15, 2011COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Feb 15, 2011PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Feb 15, 2011LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
Feb 11, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 11, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Dec 28, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance