Drawing for MELANIE SIB

USPTO serial 79020377

MELANIE SIB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3211634Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MELANIE SIB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Solomon

Steven J. Solomon Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main Avenue Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software programs for scientific use, namely, for data and image analysis in the field of proteomicsACTIVE
042[ Design, development and updating of software for scientific use for others; ] rental of software for scientific useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 3, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 27, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 15, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 25, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 10, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 30, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 30, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 30, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 12, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 29, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 29, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 29, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 11, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance