Drawing for ZI SHAN

USPTO serial 79020399

ZI SHAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZI SHAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food products made of tofu; fruit, preserved; meat, tinned; marine lives, such as fish and shrimps, tinned; vegetables, tinned; preserved bean curd; edible oils; vegetables, preserved; crystallized fruits; pickles; mushrooms, preserved; charcuterie; foods prepared from fish; milk products; eggs; fruit jellies; vegetable salads; quick-frozen vegetables, all the aforesaid goods as far as included in this classSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jun 10, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 9, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 16, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 8, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 13, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 14, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance