Drawing for YEARCON

USPTO serial 79020441

YEARCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3251952Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2007
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YEARCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025ShoesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 27, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 27, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 26, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 12, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 2, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 2, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 22, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 12, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Dec 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 3, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance