Drawing for H X

USPTO serial 79020450

H X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Glass bottles, wine bottles; wine glasses, decanters, wine tasters; sugar bowls, not of precious metal; glass jars; glass bowls, glassware for household and kitchen purposes, including glasses, plates, kettles and jars; drug bottles; beer glasses; drinking glasses and vesselsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 27, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance