USPTO serial 79020537
SUPERFLOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3240031Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERFLOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE-614 22 Söderköping, SE
SE-614 22 Söderköping, SE
SE-614 22 Söderköping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
Jeffrey H. Kaufman Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Repair, maintenance and rental of grinding, lapping, smoothing and polishing machines for industrial use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Grinding; stripping finishes; millworking; material treatment information; custom assembly of materials, for others; soldering; magnetization; metal treatment; metal casting; metal tempering; metal plating; burnishing by abrasion; water treatment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars and workshops in the field of cleaning, grinding, polishing, milling, metal casting, metalworking, metal tempering and metal plating; providing training services in the field of cleaning, grinding, polishing, milling, metal casting, metalworking, metal tempering and metal plating; organizing sporting events and cultural activities for others; arranging and conducting of conferences, congresses, seminars, workshops and symposiums in the field of cleaning, grinding, polishing, milling, metal casting, metalworking, metal tempering and metal plating; information on education; vocational guidance in the field of cleaning, grinding, polishing, milling, metal casting, metalworking, metal tempering and metal plating | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HTC SWEDEN AB
- Other trademarks owned by HTC SWEDEN AB
- Other trademarks owned by HTC SWEDEN AB
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SUPERFLOOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |