Drawing for BERTHE AUX GRANDS PIEDS

USPTO serial 79020542

BERTHE AUX GRANDS PIEDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275358Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERTHE AUX GRANDS PIEDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, footwear, headwear, socks, tights, sashes for wear and capsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 12, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 27, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 14, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 14, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 22, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 1, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance