USPTO serial 79020572
REAL MOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3220316Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2007
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REAL MOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
79108 Freiburg, DE
79108 Freiburg, DE
79108 Freiburg, DE
US
Trident Microsystems (Far East) Ltd.
KY
Other trademarks owned by Trident Microsystems (Far East) Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn
Heather A. Dunn DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microprocessors; decoders for television sets and video monitors and receivers; semiconductors; semi-conductor components, namely, transistors, diodes, memories, sensors, integrated circuits, wafers; structural parts of all of the aforesaid goods, namely, semiconductor chip housings; electric and electronic components and construction elements, namely, hybrid circuits comprising digital and analog circuits; operating system software, namely, USB operating system software; control software, namely, software to control and improve sound and video quality for digital audio and video equipment; machine-readable blank magnetic data carriers for storage of computer data and databases | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing online access to data and software via the Internet and other communication networks; providing of access to a global computer networks; electronic transmission of information via the Internet; computer-aided transmission of news and images | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development for others of computer software, and computer hardware, namely semi-conductor components, microprocessors, electric and electronic circuits, apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing of images and sound; technological consultation services and design for others with respect to the aforementioned goods; engineering; consultancy services relating to the design and development of computer software | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Micronas GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Micronas GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Micronas GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Trident Microsystems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trident Microsystems (Far East) Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REAL MOTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |