Drawing for REGENERADE

USPTO serial 79020602

REGENERADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REGENERADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical and biochemical products for use in the food industry and in the pharmaceutical industry; chemical and biochemical substances for preserving foodstuffsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
029Proteins for human consumptionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
032Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 13, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 14, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance