Drawing for SCANDINAVIA

USPTO serial 79020629

SCANDINAVIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCANDINAVIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Toilet seatsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2009DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 28, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 28, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 30, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 30, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 2, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance