USPTO serial 79020630
SALOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SALOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, and scouring preparations; soaps; liquid soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; powdered and liquid detergents, hair care products: hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair gel, hair spray, body care products: body gel, body shampoo, body creams, deodorants for personal use, hand and face creams, shaving foams, aftershave lotions, aftershave balsams, cotton swabs (toiletries), tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotion | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Air fresheners, deodorants, other than for personal use; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIBET ITHALAT IHRACAT; VE KOZMETIK SAN. A.S.
- Other trademarks owned by TIBET ITHALAT IHRACAT VE KOZMETIK SAN A.S.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named SALOON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |