USPTO serial 79020683
MEATLAND LOGISTICS & DISTRIBUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEATLAND LOGISTICS & DISTRIBUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Alginates for food, albumen for food, bouillon, fatty substances for the manufacture of edible fats, game (dead); gelatine for food, fruit jellies, meat jellies, jellies for food; suet for food, edible fats; sausages; raisins; caviar; meat, tinned; vegetables, tinned; fish, tinned; fruits, tinned; bouillon concentrates; shrimps (not live), spiny lobsters (not live); margarine, edible oils; mussels (not live), animal marrow for food, shellfish (not live); milk; meat; meat, preserved; vegetables, preserved; vegetables, dried; vegetables, cooked; lobsters (not live); nuts, prepared; liver pâté; pectin for food; liver; ham; milk products; foods prepared from fish; poultry (not live), crayfish (not live), fish (not live); fish, preserved; vegetable salads, fruit salads; bacon, pork; fat-containing mixtures for bread slices; vegetable juices for cooking; salted meats, sausages in batter; preparations for making bouillon, preparations for making soup; tripe; soups, vegetable soup preparations; cheese; sea-cucumbers (not live); truffles, preserved; oysters (not live); fruit, stewed; meat extracts, eggs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Parcel delivery; delivery of goods; delivery of goods by mail order; transportation information; storage information; car transport; hauling; porterage; transport brokerage; rental of storage containers; refrigerator rental; vehicle rental; stevedoring; unloading cargo; packaging of goods; garage rental; rental of vehicle roof racks; rental of warehouses; water supplying; wrapping of goods; courrier services (messages or merchandise); storage of goods; storage; freight forwarding | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |