USPTO serial 79020689
RIGHTCROSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIGHTCROSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, hats, footwear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 6, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |