Drawing for LODESTONE

USPTO serial 79020796

LODESTONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LODESTONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lance J. Lieberman

LANCE J LIEBERMAN COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE LLC551 FIFTH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS COMPUTER MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO SAP ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, BUSINESS PROCESS CONSULTING FOR MODELING IN SAP ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS, ADMINISTRATION OF SAP ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS COMPUTER AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTALLATIONS, BUSINESS ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES RELATED TO BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS IMPLEMENTED USING SAP ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS, AND SAP ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS OUTSOURCING AND OPERATIONSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE EDUCATION TRAINING RELATING TO SAP ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT, SYSTEM PLANNING, SYSTEM DESIGN, SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION, CUSTOM INTERFACE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, CUSTOM REPORT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, DATA CONVERSION, COMPUTER SOFTWARE CUSTOM PROGRAMMING FOR PROVIDING ADDED FUNCTIONALITY, AND COMPUTER SYSTEM SERVICING AND MAINTENANCE, ALL IN RESPECT OF SAP ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING COMPUTER SYSTEMSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2021UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Aug 8, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 26, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 8, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 10, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 16, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 16, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance