Drawing for NEO SAC

USPTO serial 79020802

NEO SAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340114Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEO SAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A Kaufman

RICHEBOURG MICHEL BP 30169, RUE ST SIMONF SAINT ETIENNE CEDEX, 42016 1TIENNE CEDEXFRANCE

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Plastic or paper bags for merchandise packaging; garbage bags of paper and plastic; paper or plastic sachets, sleeves, and pouches for packaging purposes; plastic packaging materials not for commercial or industrial purposes, namely, plastic packaging goods for household, professional, and public sector body use, namely, reels of plastic sheets, plastic sacks, rolls of plastic sheets and plastic tapesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
017Semi-processed plastic in the form of films, sheets, and barsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 6, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 10, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Aug 3, 2006RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 3, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance