USPTO serial 79020819
Serial No. 79020819
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79020819?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Alginates for food, albumen for food, bouillon, fatty substances for the manufacture of edible fats, game (dead); gelatine for food, fruit jellies, meat jellies, jellies for food; suet for food, edible fats; sausages; raisins; caviar; meat, tinned; vegetables, tinned; fish, tinned; fruits, tinned; bouillon concentrates; shrimps (not live), spiny lobsters (not live); margarine, edible oils; mussels (not live), animal marrow for food, shellfish (not live); milk; meat; meat, preserved; vegetables, preserved; vegetables, dried; vegetables, cooked; lobsters (not live); nuts, prepared; liver pâté; pectin for food; liver; ham; milk products; foods prepared from fish; poultry (not live), crayfish (not live), fish (not live); fish, preserved; vegetable salads, fruit salads; bacon, pork; fat-containing mixtures for bread slices; vegetable juices for cooking; salted meats, sausages in batter; preparations for making bouillon, preparations for making soup; tripe; soups, vegetable soup preparations; cheese; sea-cucumbers (not live); truffles, preserved; oysters (not live); fruit, stewed; meat extracts, eggs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Parcel delivery; delivery of goods; delivery of goods by mail order; transportation information; storage information; car transport; hauling; porterage; transport brokerage; rental of storage containers; refrigerator rental; vehicle rental; stevedoring; unloading cargo; packaging of goods; garage rental; rental of vehicle roof racks; rental of warehouses; water supplying; wrapping of goods; courrier services (messages or merchandise); storage of goods; storage; freight forwarding | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |