USPTO serial 79020826
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
H.G.V. Haus und Garten - Marketing- und vertriebsgesellschaft mbH
66450 Bexbach, DE
Other trademarks owned by H.G.V. Haus und Garten - Marketing- und vertriebsgesellschaft mbH
H.G.V. Haus und Garten - Marketing- und; vertriebsgesellschaft mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by H.G.V. Haus und Garten - Marketing- und; vertriebsgesellschaft mbH
H.G.V. Haus und Garten - Marketing- und; vertriebsgesellschaft mbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by H.G.V. Haus und Garten - Marketing- und; vertriebsgesellschaft mbH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Geissler
MARTIN R GEISSLER MCGRATH, GEISSLER, OLDS & RICBARDSON, PLPO BOX 1364FAIRFAX, VA 22038-1364UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Stretching beds composed of metal for fastening workpieces for processing; metal vice benches and workbenches; metal suspension and support trestles for use as table supports | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Tool lathes, machine tool tables; machine frames for use with machine tools; milling-drilling machines, threading machines, milling machines, mechanical copying milling cutters, mechanical table saws | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | wheelbarrows | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |