USPTO serial 79020838
DURASEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURASEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Water quality conditioning units; water softening units; water distillation units; water treatment equipment, namely reverse osmosis filtration units; water filtering units for domestic and commercial use; water storage tanks for use with water filtration systems; water purification tanks; tanks for water softening brine for use with water softening apparatus; water treatment equipment, namely chemical sterilization units; water treatment equipment, namely cartridge filtration units and filter cartridge housings; water filters, waste water purification units and water treatment equipment, namely membrane filtration units and aerobic and anaerobic bioreactors; water purifying apparatus for swimming pool and spa equipment, namely automatic dispensers for dispensing water purification materials; aquarium filtration apparatus not for the fishery industry; desalination plants | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 30, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 16, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |