Drawing for GREENSMART

USPTO serial 79020871

GREENSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340116Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward M. Prince

EDWARD M PRINCE ALSTON & BIRD LLPTHE ATLANTIC BLDG950 F ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SOAPS AND DETERGENTS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE THAT CONTAIN MICROBES, NUTRIENTS AND/OR ENZYMES USED FOR THE PURPOSES OF CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE AND INITIATING THE NATURAL BREAKDOWN OF GREASE, OIL, HEAVY GRIME AND ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS INTO COMPONENTS THAT DO NOT HARM THE ENVIRONMENTSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 6, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jan 24, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Nov 29, 2007AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Nov 29, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 23, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 23, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Jul 19, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Jul 5, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 31, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 27, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 27, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance