USPTO serial 79020871
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, DK
DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, DK
DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, DK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Prince
EDWARD M PRINCE ALSTON & BIRD LLPTHE ATLANTIC BLDG950 F ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1404| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS AND DETERGENTS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE THAT CONTAIN MICROBES, NUTRIENTS AND/OR ENZYMES USED FOR THE PURPOSES OF CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE AND INITIATING THE NATURAL BREAKDOWN OF GREASE, OIL, HEAVY GRIME AND ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS INTO COMPONENTS THAT DO NOT HARM THE ENVIRONMENT | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |