Drawing for FERROPORE

USPTO serial 79020927

FERROPORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275361Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FERROPORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell P. Brook

Mitchell P. Brook Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP600 West Broadway, Suite 2600San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Filtering materials, namely mineral substances in the nature of filtering materials in the industries of sewage and waste water treatmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Filtering installations and filtering apparatus, namely water filters for purification installations; water purification installations and component parts thereofSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 27, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 14, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 14, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 31, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 30, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Nov 29, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance