Drawing for NEUROSENSORIX

USPTO serial 79020955

NEUROSENSORIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUROSENSORIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. Bruce Hamburg

PATENTANWÄLTE SCHONENFAHRESTR. 7SCHNICK & GARRELSROSTOCK FED REP, 18057GERMAN DEMOCRATIC

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009measuring apparatus and measuring instruments, namely, measuring apparatus and measuring instruments including semiconductor chips in combination with live neuronal tissue for determining effects of various substances on neurons and control and data analysis apparatus for use with the chipsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042scientific testing of neuronal tissueSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 24, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 16, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 28, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 7, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
May 25, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance