USPTO serial 79020962
Serial No. 79020962
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3272549Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- JORDAN, AMEETA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79020962?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices, P.C.5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine-driven tools and their components, namely, power-operated metal cutters, power-operated drills, power-operated pilot, center and lead drill bits for drills, reborers and out-borers, super-finish lathe tools, reamers, counter sinkers and deburrers, lances, threaders; machine-driven facing lathe heads; [machine-driven special tools and their components, namely, machine-driven saws, saw blades and saw inserts made of hard cutting materials for the aforementioned saws;] tool-holding fixtures and adapters, namely, taper shanks, clamping chucks, extension and reducing pieces for machine tools, namely, spindle attachment flanges, taper shanks, chucks, aligning holders with adjustable concentricity, floating holders for alignment and angular compensation; machine-driven modular add-on tools with couplings as interface and separation points for a manual or machine-operated coupling of tools to machine tool spindles and tools as well as of tool components to one another; machine-tool spindles; machine parts, namely, cutting inserts, reversible cutting plates, lathe chisels, clamps, holders, screws and clamping and mounting inserts and holders for drilling, setting and clamping of machine-driven tools; setting machines with electrical and electronic components for the setting, aligning and adjustment of machine tools for the aforementioned goods; machine tools, namely, drills and reamers, with integrated electronic measuring systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Setting gauges and setting machines with and without electrical and electronic components in the form of tool control units and machine control units for the setting and adjustment of tools, namely, adjusting gauges for adjusting and aligning tools; receivers for control signals, sensors, electrical and electronic measuring and evaluation devices, namely, data translators, data loggers and data recorders for machine-driven tools; wired and wireless fixed, moving, in particular, rotating control, energy and data transmission devices, namely, transmitting and receiving devices, namely, transmitters, transducers and data controllers for machine-driven tools; computer programs stored on data carriers for the handling, operation and adjustment of machine-driven tools; computers for the handling, operation and adjustment of machine-driven tools, displays and operators for machine-driven tools; data carriers, namely, blank and pre-recorded data carriers featuring data for power-operated tools; reading and translation devices for data carriers, namely, translators for data of power-operated tools; all of which are sold separately from the tools | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Creation, leasing and maintenance of data processing programs for the handling, operation and adjustment of machine-driven tools; development of technical system solutions in the tool sector; technical project and design planning, namely, for tools, machine tools, tools for machine tools and their accessories; development and research services with regard to new products, namely, power-operated tools, machine tools and tools for machine tools and their accessories; research in the field of tool manufacture and mechanical engineering; services of engineers; [services of an industrial and technical graphic artist and designer;] development and updating of programs for software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KOMET Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by KOMET GROUP Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by KOMET GROUP Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by KOMET GROUP Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |