USPTO serial 79020968
KRAUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRAUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Transportable buildings of metal; pipes and tubes of metal;goods of common metal, namely, ladders, scaffolds, stairs, platforms and crossovers; metal scaffolding for all construction types, namely, scaffolding and other work scaffolding, guard scaffolding, support scaffolding, namely erecting scaffolds, false work and soffit scaffolds, moveable scaffolding, tower scaffolding of metal; metal scaffolding work platforms, tribunes, platforms; metal roofing and roof constructions, namely, metal roofing panels, metal roofing tiles;dismount able halls and buildings of metal; metal form work; metal material chutes for building; metal lightweight halls, consisting of building wall framing made primarily of metal; porches of metal; metal ladders; steps of metal;prefabricated parts of metal for erecting the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic rigid pipes for building; non-metallic transportable buildings; non-metallic scaffolding for all construction types,namely, scaffolding and other work scaffolding, guard scaffolding, support scaffolding, namely, erecting scaffolds, false work and soffit scaffolding,moveable scaffolding, tower scaffolding; non-metallic scaffolding work platforms, tribunes, platforms; prefabricated non-metal buildings, namely,dismount able halls and buildings; non-metal framework and non-metal material chutes for building, non-metal lightweight halls consisting of building wall framing made primarily of non-metal material; non-metal porches; non-metal prefabricated parts for erecting the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Ladders and steps made of plastic and wood; non-metal ladders; non-metal steps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |