USPTO serial 79020970
RAILSERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3253909Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2007
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAILSERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH D LEWIS
KNORR BREMSE AG PATENTABTEILUNG V/RGMOOSACHER STRASSE 80M NCHEN FED REP, 80809GERMAN DEMOCRATICGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Passenger information systems, namely electronic display and information panels, power-electric systems, namely circuit breakers, power resistors, overvoltage limiters, brake resistors, devices for the transmission of electric power, goods wagon position indicators, railway bogie diagnosis devices, safety installations for railroads, namely railway barriers and signalling devices for railroad crossings, traffic control signals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Air-conditioning systems for vehicles consisting of a control unit, compressor, fluid tubes, an evaporator and condensor | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Utility vehicles and rail-bound vehicles, namely trains, rail cars, passenger carriages, trucks, cars, all of the foregoing for long-distance and short-distance traffic as well as for passenger and cargo traffic; brakes for the aforesaid vehicles; brake systems for the aforesaid vehicles consisting of electric brake controllers and air supply systems; automatic vehicle doors and associated train platform doors; toilets for rail vehicles; windscreen wipers; windscreen washer systems comrised of windscreen wipers, gears, and motors; braking devices using sand as a braking medium; shock absorbers for vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KNORR-BREMSE AG
- Other trademarks owned by KNORR-BREMSE AG
- Other trademarks owned by KNORR-BREMSE AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named RAILSERVICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS NOT UPDATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |