Drawing for NTO E ETOR

USPTO serial 79021063

NTO E ETOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NTO E ETOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing,namelyspecify in class 25 by common commerical name,e;g;shirts,shorts,trousers,dresses; footwear, headwear.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 14, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 31, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 23, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 29, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance