USPTO serial 79021085
SURE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3242665Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2007
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-1241 CR Kortenhoef, NL
NL-1241 CR Kortenhoef, NL
NL-1241 CR Kortenhoef, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H JOHN CAMPAIGN, JOHN M KEENE, MILENA MISHEV
MILENA S. MISHEV GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH ST STE 1201THE BAR BUILDINGNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Candies, candy bars, sugarless candies not sold in grocery or drug stores | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 25, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |