USPTO serial 79021143
NOVARO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVARO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bouillon; preparations for making bouillon; bouillon concentrates; coconut butter; peanut butter; broth concentrates; potato crisps; edible oils; powdered eggs; fruit chips; preserved garden herbs; meat extracts; milk beverages (milk predominating); milk products; olive oil for food; palm kernel oil for food; palm oil for food; potato chips; potato fritters; powdered eggs; preparations for making soups; vegetable soup preparations; soups; sunflower oil for food; dried vegetables | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Biscuits; cake paste; cake powder; cakes; edible decorations for cakes; flavorings (flavourings), other than essential oils, for cakes; rice cakes; capers; cereal preparations; chips (cereal products); chow-chow (condiment); condiments; corn meal; crackers; farinaceous food pastes; farinaceous foods; maize flakes; oat flakes; flour for food; farinaceous foods; essences for foodstuffs (except etheric essences and essential oils); ketchup (sauce); macaroni; macaroons (pastry); malt biscuits; meal; farinaceous food pastes; petit-beurre biscuits; potato flour for food; relish (condiment); ribbon vermicelli; rice; rice cakes; saffron (seasoning); seasonings; spaghetti; spices; soya sauce; tomato sauce; sauce (condiments); ribbon vermicelli; vermicelli (noodles); waffles; wheat flour | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by "Technokom" Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Vesna Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by TOVARISTVO Z OBMEJENOYU VIDPOVIDALNISTU "TECHNOKOM"
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NOVARO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |