USPTO serial 79021182
OGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3242667Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2007
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL
NL-1261 BG Blaricum, NL
NL-1261 BG Blaricum, NL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, suits, dress-suits, shirts, dress-shirts, pants, jackets, shawls, coats, cardigans, vests, jerseys, sweaters, socks, gloves, ties, tuxedos, blazers, skirts, dresses, t-shirts; footwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of clothing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 11, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |