Drawing for S SERRANO ESPAÑOL CONSORCIO DEL JAMÓN SERRANO ESPAÑOL

USPTO serial 79021196

S SERRANO ESPAÑOL CONSORCIO DEL JAMÓN SERRANO ESPAÑOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3298201Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S SERRANO ESPAÑOL CONSORCIO DEL JAMÓN SERRANO ESPAÑOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029HamsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035ADVERTISING SERVICES; SERVICES OF ASSISTANCE TO COMPANY AND INDUSTRY COMMERCIAL FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, BUSINESS CONSULTINGSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 19, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 2, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 2, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 14, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 30, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 31, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance