USPTO serial 79021224
GRIDSEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3275367Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRIDSEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal
NOVAGRAAF NEDERLAND BV HOGEHILWEG 3POSTBUS 22722NL-1101 CA AMSTERDAM-ZUIDOOST,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Construction material, namely a pavement reinforcing system, not of metal, consisting primarily of a glass fiber fabric grid, and an asphalt binder and sealant to improve the physical characteristics of the pavement to reduce the likelihood of physical deterioration of the pavement due to stress, cracking and fatigue | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Noordhollandse Asfalt Centrale B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Ooms Producten B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Ooms Producten B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Ooms Producten B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named GRIDSEAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2010 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |