Drawing for RENOLIT EXTRUSION

USPTO serial 79021264

RENOLIT EXTRUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3382046Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2008
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENOLIT EXTRUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD L. SCHWAAB

RICHARD L. SCHWAAB FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K STREET, NWSUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Plastic material for packaging, namely, bags and bubble packsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
017Extruded plastics in the form of bars, blocks, pellets, sheets, films, and tubes for use in manufacturing; plastic film other than for packaging for use in manufacturing; plastic film for packaging for commerical or industrial useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 12, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 21, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Aug 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
May 19, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 19, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 1, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 4, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance