USPTO serial 79021309
OLIVE OIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLIVE OIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Garments, namely blazers, cardigans, jackets, waistcoats, coats, overcoats, gabardines, sashes, stoles, scarves, gloves, mittens, belts, blouses, overalls, shirts, nightshirts, polo shirts, T-shirts, tank tops, tops, pullovers, jerseys, sweaters, trousers, skirts, miniskirts, suits, dresses, afternoon dresses, evening dresses, wedding dresses, headscarves, hats; footwear, namely shoes, boots, clogs, moccasins, sandals, training shoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |