Drawing for VAS

USPTO serial 79021357

VAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARTZOG, WOODROW
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighters; light bulbs; projector lamps; lamp hanging supports; guard devices for lighting; street lamps; fluorescent lights; discharge tubes, electric, for lighting; incandescent burners, lamps (burners for-)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 21, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 25, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Feb 9, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Feb 7, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Dec 19, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance