Drawing for Serial No. 79021360

USPTO serial 79021360

Serial No. 79021360

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79021360?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags including travel bags, beach bags and shoulder bags; backpacks and rucksacks; wallets including wallets for money; pursesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, footwear, headgear, including shorts, shirts, skirts, dresses, T-shirts, swimsuits, board shorts, jumpers and jackets, hats, caps, sun visors, sandals, footwear for beach useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 9, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 6, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 6, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance