Drawing for RHUMADOL

USPTO serial 79021452

RHUMADOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHUMADOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely medicines used in the treatment of arthralgia (joint pain); dietetic substances adapted for medical use namely food supplements designed to relieve arthralgia (joint pain)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 20, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 13, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 23, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 15, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 5, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 6, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance