Drawing for COPAT

USPTO serial 79021458

COPAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3280097Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2007
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COPAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NILS E PEDERSEN

RAY THOMAS, JR. Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street N.W.Suite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating and water supply apparatus, namely, refrigerators, stoves, ovens, lighting fixtures, steam generators, electric pasta-makers for domestic use, cook tops, freezers; faucets; sinks; toilets; showers; whirlpool bathtubsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Furniture; furniture, namely, wall units; mirrors; non-metal picture frames; furnishing articles, namely, tables, chairs, countertops, sideboards, benches, stools; bathroom and kitchen accessories, namely, non-metal handles for drawers, wood knobs, shelves for kitchens and bathrooms, drawers for kitchens and bathrooms, dividers for drawers, non-metal doors, cupboards; pedestals; work-top slabs comprised of faced chipboard, glass, marble, marble agglomerates and synthetic materials, for bathroom and kitchen furnitureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 6, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 27, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 21, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 21, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 31, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 13, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 25, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 7, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 29, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 28, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 6, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance